The most pivotal component of a scientific study is the documentation of its findings and its communication to a global audience of fellow researchers. Most often, the modus operandi of this process is through publication of work in a scientific journal. To ensure and encourage high quality research, several journals follow a peer review process. This allows an independent body of experts to scrutinize, critique and assess the authenticity of the claims. Although not bound by a defined set of rules, the craft of communicating scientific data can be bettered through experience, critical thinking and a voracious reading habit.
A good research article is well-structured and essentially contains a few key elements. It begins with a descriptive title, an abstract that briefly describes the hypothesis and key findings of the study and an introduction that describes background literature based upon which the hypothesis is generated. The methodology section should describe in detail all the procedures used to generate the data. Often underrated, this section must be given special emphasis as it determines the reproducibility of the study/experiment. Perhaps the results and discussion section can be described as the ‘head honcho’ of the study as it receives a glaring amount of attention. Although the results are of primary importance to the study, of equal importance is the discussion. The latter must derive meaningful correlations between the hypothesis and obtained results. A cohesive narrative that strings together all the key elements highly benefits the readers. Technically speaking, it must not leave any room for ambiguity. Each sentence must be articulated in what can be described as a ‘crisp’, precise and scientifically-sound language.
The phrase ‘A picture is worth a thousand words’ is rightly said in the context of scientific writing. Pictorial representation of data in the form of photographs, graphs, workflows etc. allows the readers to quickly assimilate the information rather than simply read volumes of texts. Citing the reference(s) at appropriate positions in the text is an essential component of scientific writing. References are employed either to generate a certain hypothesis or to support claims made in the study. However, while gathering information from the available literature, the authors must be vigilant to avoid plagiarism! Software tools are available to run a plagiarism check and also rectify grammatical errors, if any.
Although writing a research article constitutes a major form of scientific writing, there also exist other forms of scientific writing such as record-keeping in a lab notebook, publishing in a scientific magazine, writing a project progress/proposal reports or even writing a blog!! The style, content, length and presentation are strikingly distinct in each case to suit a niche audience. Apart from contributing to the resume of the author, scientific writing also contributes to the generation of knowledge that may also serve as the basis for generating future hypothesis.
In short, scientific writing is akin to storytelling. After all, there is a plot (the hypothesis), a ploy (the methodology) and a pen to wield the story (the results)!!
Saketh Kapoor is a Graduate student at Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University).
6565total visits,2visits today
13 Replies to “Plot, ploy and the pen: The art of scientific writing”
apart from plot, ploy and pen . A brain of a genuis like u is required. amazing blog
Very precise and well written…. Kudos
A lot has been told, written and editorials by journals about art of scientific writing, However this piece is one of the simplest way to make sure ” you got the right writing skills”.
Good blog, keep coming, looking forward to have more from you.
Way to go brother. Excellent structure and head on clarity.
Keep it up
Great share. The skill of writing and way of presentation is of utmost importance to show the impact of work. This article simply and crisply describes the proper way of penning down a work. Thanks for posting. Heads up ?
I think it is important to note that not all scientific/technical writing is performed by a qualified scientist or engineer. I would argue most is not and, therefore, scientific/technical writers do not perform experiments or collect data themselves. The data is generally collected and recorded by a scientist or engineer on a data sheet. A writer, however, may oversee a segment of the data collection to understand what is being collected and why. This is a critical element of scientific/technical writing which is not discussed in your lecture. In many ways, you are suggesting only qualified scientists and engineers write about science and what they write goes directly to external readers. In the corporate world, this is not the case at all. Qualified engineers and scientists generally make notes and collect data. Professional scientific/technical writers, with degrees in writing https://topwritingcompanies.com/ and a general background in science/engineering do the actual writing and editing of external documentation.
With thanks! Valuable information!
With thanks! Valuable information!
It?s hard to come by knowledgeable people on this subject, however, you
Delivering your knowledge is the best help one can posses and “One has to have good orating skills to be a global citizen”. This blog trains very well to get a step closer! Surely helping for the budding scientific writers.
Well written ….. What about some narratives as References?